linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] irq/urgent for 5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ym6BgmOY4zxlbiIx@zn.tnic>
Date:   Sun, 1 May 2022 14:48:02 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Ozgur Karatas <ozgurk@...e.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] irq/urgent for 5.18

On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 04:24:22PM +0400, Ozgur Karatas wrote:
> I didnt think return value was an invalid argument and thought it might be
> return= -EINVAL;
> and i was wondering why error return, if not an invalid argument.
> So if there is no bad argument assigned to function I think error =
> -EINVAL; should be return = -EINVAL instead right?

Try building your suggestion.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Ivo Totev, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg