[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54adc4a3-6b66-8ddf-db92-9630089da2dd@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 19:37:02 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: work around QEMU issue with synthetic CPUID
leaves
On 5/1/22 13:16, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>> + * However, only do it if the host has CPUID leaf 0x8000001d.
>> + * QEMU thinks that it can query the host blindly for that
>> + * CPUID leaf if KVM reports that it supports 0x8000001d or
>> + * above. The processor merrily returns values from the
>> + * highest Intel leaf which QEMU tries to use as the guest's
>> + * 0x8000001d. Even worse, this can result in an infinite
>> + * loop if said highest leaf has no subleaves indexed by ECX.
>
> Very small nitpick: It might be useful to add a note that qemu does this only for the
> leaf 0x8000001d.
Yes, it's there: "QEMU thinks that it can query the host blindly for
that CPUID leaf", "that" is 0x8000001d in the previous sentence.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists