[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f0302382cf45d7a9527b4aebbfe694bbcfa7aff5.1651440202.git.maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 00:07:36 +0200
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/12] KVM: nSVM: Drop support for CPUs without NRIPS (NextRIP Save) support
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Drop nested support for CPUs without NRIPS, as requiring NRIPS
simplifies a handful of paths in KVM.
NRIPS was introduced in 2009, i.e. every AMD-based CPU released in the
last decade should support NRIPS.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Not-signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
[MSS: Just drop nested support for these CPUs instead of SVM support in general]
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 14 +++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index 2cf92c12706a..e5c05e3427ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -691,14 +691,13 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
/*
* next_rip is consumed on VMRUN as the return address pushed on the
* stack for injected soft exceptions/interrupts. If nrips is exposed
- * to L1, take it verbatim from vmcb12. If nrips is supported in
- * hardware but not exposed to L1, stuff the actual L2 RIP to emulate
- * what a nrips=0 CPU would do (L1 is responsible for advancing RIP
- * prior to injecting the event).
+ * to L1, take it verbatim from vmcb12. If nrips is not exposed to L1,
+ * stuff the actual L2 RIP to emulate what an nrips=0 CPU would do (L1
+ * is responsible for advancing RIP prior to injecting the event).
*/
if (svm->nrips_enabled)
vmcb02->control.next_rip = svm->nested.ctl.next_rip;
- else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
+ else
vmcb02->control.next_rip = vmcb12_rip;
svm->nmi_l1_to_l2 = is_evtinj_nmi(vmcb02->control.event_inj);
@@ -706,10 +705,7 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
svm->soft_int_injected = true;
svm->soft_int_csbase = svm->vmcb->save.cs.base;
svm->soft_int_old_rip = vmcb12_rip;
- if (svm->nrips_enabled)
- svm->soft_int_next_rip = svm->nested.ctl.next_rip;
- else
- svm->soft_int_next_rip = vmcb12_rip;
+ svm->soft_int_next_rip = vmcb02->control.next_rip;
}
vmcb02->control.virt_ext = vmcb01->control.virt_ext &
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 88eacbbe9348..dc980fa0daa8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4330,9 +4330,7 @@ static int svm_check_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
break;
}
- /* TODO: Advertise NRIPS to guest hypervisor unconditionally */
- if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
- vmcb->control.next_rip = info->next_rip;
+ vmcb->control.next_rip = info->next_rip;
vmcb->control.exit_code = icpt_info.exit_code;
vmexit = nested_svm_exit_handled(svm);
@@ -4961,6 +4959,16 @@ static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void)
pause_filter_thresh = 0;
}
+ if (nrips) {
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
+ nrips = false;
+ }
+
+ if (!nrips && nested) {
+ pr_notice("kvm: Nested Virtualization requires NRIPS (NextRIP Save)\n");
+ nested = false;
+ }
+
if (nested) {
printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: Nested Virtualization enabled\n");
kvm_enable_efer_bits(EFER_SVME | EFER_LMSLE);
@@ -4995,11 +5003,6 @@ static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void)
goto err;
}
- if (nrips) {
- if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
- nrips = false;
- }
-
enable_apicv = avic = avic && npt_enabled && (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVIC) || force_avic);
if (enable_apicv) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists