[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWN_ni_V+e3QipWH2qKXeNPkEcVpHpb5iBYw1YQSAnCDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 11:19:19 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Clement Leger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,pci-rcar-gen2: Add
device tree support for r9a06g032
Hi Krzysztof,
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 10:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 29/04/2022 15:41, Herve Codina wrote:
> > Add internal PCI bridge support for the r9a06g032 SOC. The Renesas
> > RZ/N1D (R9A06G032) internal PCI bridge is compatible with the one
> > present in the R-Car Gen2 family.
> > Compared to the R-Car Gen2 family, it needs three clocks instead of
> > one.
> >
> > The 'resets' property for the RZ/N1 family is not required since
> > there is no reset-controller support yet for the RZ/N1 family.
>
> This should not be a reason why a property is or is not required. Either
> this is required for device operation or not. If it is required, should
> be in the bindings. Otherwise what are you going to do in the future?
> Add a required property breaking the ABI?
The problem is that there are no bindings for the reset controller
(actually the reset controller feature of the system-controller) yet.
Yeah, we can just add #reset-cells = <1> to the system-controller
device node, but we cannot add the actual resets properties to the
consumers, until the actual cell values are defined.
> > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists