[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220502095321.GA20579@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 10:53:21 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Wonhyuk Yang <vvghjk1234@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ohhoon Kwon <ohkwon1043@...il.com>,
JaeSang Yoo <jsyoo5b@...il.com>,
Jiyoup Kim <lakroforce@...il.com>,
Donghyeok Kim <dthex5d@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: cache the result of node_dirty_ok()
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 10:10:32AM +0900, Wonhyuk Yang wrote:
> To spread dirty page, nodes are checked whether
> it reached the dirty limit using the expensive
> node_dirty_ok(). To reduce the number of calling
> node_dirty_ok(), last node that hit the dirty
> limit is cached.
>
> Instead of caching the node, caching both node
> and it's result of node_dirty_ok() can reduce
> the number of calling node_dirty_ok() more than
> before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wonhyuk Yang <vvghjk1234@...il.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
I agree with Andrew that last_pgdat_dirty_ok is a better name. The old
name was also bad but seeing as the area is being changed, fixing the
name is harmless.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists