linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the input tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 May 2022 12:17:36 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the input tree

Hi all,

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:48:25 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the input tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/input/keyboard/mtk-pmic-keys.c:93:36: error: 'MT6359_TOPSTATUS' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'MT6358_TOPSTATUS'?
>    93 |                 MTK_PMIC_KEYS_REGS(MT6359_TOPSTATUS,
>       |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/input/keyboard/mtk-pmic-keys.c:48:35: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_PMIC_KEYS_REGS'
>    48 |         .deb_reg                = _deb_reg,             \
>       |                                   ^~~~~~~~
> drivers/input/keyboard/mtk-pmic-keys.c:98:25: error: 'MT6359_TOP_RST_MISC' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'MT6358_TOP_RST_MISC'?
>    98 |         .pmic_rst_reg = MT6359_TOP_RST_MISC,
>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                         MT6358_TOP_RST_MISC
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   0f97adf64314 ("Input: mtk-pmic-keys - add support for MT6359")
> 
> I have used the input tree from next-20220426 for today.

I am still getting this failure.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped