[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <165146932944.24404.17790836056748683378@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 15:28:49 +1000
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: "Miaohe Lin" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MM: handle THP in swap_*page_fs() - count_vm_events()
On Mon, 02 May 2022, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 02:57:46PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > @@ -390,9 +392,9 @@ static void sio_read_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long ret)
> > struct page *page = sio->bvec[p].bv_page;
> >
> > SetPageUptodate(page);
> > + count_swpout_vm_event(page);
> > unlock_page(page);
> > }
> > - count_vm_events(PSWPIN, sio->pages);
>
> Surely that should be count_swpIN_vm_event?
>
I'm not having a good day....
Certainly shouldn't be swpout. There isn't a count_swpin_vm_event().
swap_readpage() only counts once for each page no matter how big it is.
While swap_writepage() counts one for each PAGE_SIZE written.
And we have THP_SWPOUT but not THP_SWPIN
And I cannot find where any of these counters are documents, so I cannot
say what is "correct".
Well.... arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c says
u64 pswpin; /* pages swapped in */
u64 pswpout; /* pages swapped out */
but that isn't exactly unambiguous, and is for s390 which doesn't
support THP_SWAP
Ho hum. I guess I put that back as it was.
Thanks for the review!!!
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists