[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee3feb13-fbf8-6651-76ff-1324878d72e8@digikod.net>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 21:13:05 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clang-format inconsistencies with checkpatch.pl
On 23/04/2022 13:45, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use clang-format (with a pinned version, probably 14) to
> keep a consistent coding style, or at least start with one. However,
> there is some inconsistencies with the checkpatch.pl script:
>
> In some cases, goto labels are indented, which checkpatch.pl doesn't like.
This can be fixed with SplitEmptyFunction: false. I'll send a patch for
that if it's OK with you.
>
> checkpatch.pl complains about some functions (e.g. FIXTURE or
> FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD) that get an open brace just after but without a space.
Miguel, do you know how/if clang-format can enforce that style? FIXTURE
macros are struct declarations though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists