| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c40c2f81-008a-06cf-8de3-d0bb787a9889@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 07:37:12 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: krzk@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus
Hi,
Le 03/05/2022 à 04:13, Li-hao Kuo a écrit :
> Add thermal driver for Sunplus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org>
> ---
> Changes in v8:
> - Modify yaml file.
> modify the setting compatible
> - Change yaml file name.
> - Modify driver.
> mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable
>
> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++
> drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 +++
> drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index edc96cd..82143ff 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
> F: drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
>
> +SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER
> +M: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org>
> +L: linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@...lic.gmane.org
> +S: Maintained
> +F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
> +
> SUNPLUS UART DRIVER
> M: Hammer Hsieh <hammerh0314-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org>
> S: Maintained
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> index 0e5cc94..595f507 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> @@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL
> If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled
> by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards.
>
> +config SUNPLUS_THERMAL
> + tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers"
> + depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive
> + temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
> +
> + If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option
> + to have support for thermal management
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> index f0c36a1..38a76f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> @@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL) += uniphier_thermal.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL) += amlogic_thermal.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL) += sprd_thermal.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL) += khadas_mcu_fan.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL) += sunplus_thermal.o
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d4e22fc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) Sunplus Inc.
> + * Author: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> +
> +#define ENABLE_THERMAL BIT(31)
> +#define SP_THERMAL_MASK GENMASK(10, 0)
> +
> +#define TEMP_RATE 608
> +#define TEMP_BASE 3500
> +#define TEMP_OTP_BASE 1518
> +
> +#define SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG 0x0000
> +#define SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG 0x0030
> +
> +/* common data structures */
> +struct sp_thermal_data {
> + struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz;
> + void __iomem *regs;
> + int *otp_temp0;
> +};
> +
> +static int sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data, struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct nvmem_cell *cell;
> + ssize_t otp_l;
> +
> + cell = nvmem_cell_get(dev, "calib");
> + if (IS_ERR(cell))
> + return PTR_ERR(cell);
> +
> + sp_data->otp_temp0 = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);
> + nvmem_cell_put(cell);
> +
> + if (*sp_data->otp_temp0 == 0)
> + *sp_data->otp_temp0 = TEMP_OTP_BASE;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * There is a thermal sensor instance for SUNPLUS Soc
> + * T_CODE is the ADC of the thermal sensor
> + * T_CODE : 11 digits in total
> + * When remanufacturing, the 35 degree T_CODE will be read and stored in nvcell.
> + * otp_temp0 is the 35 degree T_CODE obtained from nvcell
> + * The function will get 35 degree T_CODE for thermal calibration.
> + * TEMP_RATE is the SUNPLUS thermal temperature slope.
> + */
> +
> +static int sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp(void *data, int *temp)
> +{
> + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = data;
> + int t_code;
> +
> + t_code = readl(sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG);
> + t_code = FIELD_GET(SP_THERMAL_MASK, t_code);
> + *temp = ((*sp_data->otp_temp0 - t_code) * 10000 / TEMP_RATE) + TEMP_BASE;
> + *temp *= 10;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sp_of_thermal_ops = {
> + .get_temp = sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp,
> +};
> +
> +static int sunplus_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + sp_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sp_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sp_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sp_data->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(sp_data->regs)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "resource get fail\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(sp_data->regs);
> + }
> +
> + writel(ENABLE_THERMAL, sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG);
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sp_data);
> + ret = sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(sp_data, &pdev->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + sp_data->pcb_tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> + 0,
> + sp_data, &sp_of_thermal_ops);
sp_data->pcb_tz is the result of devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
and devm_ functions usually don't need any clean-up. It is done
automagically by the kernel itself.
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sp_data->pcb_tz))
> + return PTR_ERR(sp_data->pcb_tz);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int sunplus_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + thermal_zone_device_unregister(sp_data->pcb_tz);
But here it is unregistered.
1) I would have expected that no unregister function is needed.
2) Should one be there, based on naming,
thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister() would look more consistent.
I know nothing about the thermal API, so don't take this comment too
seriously. It just look odd to me when I gave it a look.
Just my 2c,
CJ
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id of_sunplus_thermal_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "sunplus,thermal" },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_sunplus_thermal_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver sunplus_thermal_driver = {
> + .probe = sunplus_thermal_probe,
> + .remove = sunplus_thermal_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "sunplus-thermal",
> + .of_match_table = of_sunplus_thermal_ids,
> + },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(sunplus_thermal_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Thermal driver for sunplus SoC");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists