[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220503225353.GA415393@bhelgaas>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 17:53:53 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazonni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: of: create DT nodes for PCI devices if they do
not exists
In subject:
PCI: of: Create DT nodes ... if they do not exist
The subject could be read as saying that you're going to create DT
nodes before the PCI devices exist, but I think you mean that when we
enumerate a PCI devices, we're *always* going to create a DT node for
it, even if the DT didn't mention it.
Maybe something like:
PCI: of: Create DT node for every PCI device
although I see Rob thinks this should be done on demand instead of
doing it for every device, which sounds sensible to me.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:45:01AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> In order to apply overlays to PCI device nodes, the nodes must first
> exist. This commit add support to populate a skeleton tree for PCI bus
> and devices. These nodes can then be used by drivers to apply overlays.
s/This commit add support/Add support/
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists