[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220503080958.20220-4-sargun@sargun.me>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 01:09:58 -0700
From: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...volk.io>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] selftests/seccomp: Add test for wait killable notifier
This verifies that if a filter is set up with the wait killable feature
that it obeys the semantics that non-fatal signals are ignored during
a notification after the notification is received.
Cases tested:
* Non-fatal signal prior to receive
* Non-fatal signal during receive
* Fatal signal after receive
The normal signal handling is tested in user_notification_signal. That
behaviour remains unchanged.
On an unsupported kernel, these tests will immediately bail as it relies
on a new seccomp flag.
Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 228 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 4fb5eda89223..931dd1b6d385 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@
#define SKIP(s, ...) XFAIL(s, ##__VA_ARGS__)
#endif
+#define MIN(X, Y) ((X) < (Y) ? (X) : (Y))
+
#ifndef PR_SET_PTRACER
# define PR_SET_PTRACER 0x59616d61
#endif
@@ -268,6 +270,10 @@ struct seccomp_notif_addfd_big {
#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH (1UL << 4)
#endif
+#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV
+#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV (1UL << 5)
+#endif
+
#ifndef seccomp
int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args)
{
@@ -4362,6 +4368,228 @@ TEST(user_notification_fifo)
}
}
+/* get_proc_syscall - Get the syscall in progress for a given pid
+ *
+ * Returns the current syscall number for a given process
+ * Returns -1 if not in syscall (running or blocked)
+ */
+static long get_proc_syscall(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, int pid)
+{
+ char proc_path[100] = {0};
+ long ret = -1;
+ ssize_t nread;
+ char *line;
+
+ snprintf(proc_path, sizeof(proc_path), "/proc/%d/syscall", pid);
+ nread = get_nth(_metadata, proc_path, 1, &line);
+ ASSERT_GT(nread, 0);
+
+ if (!strncmp("running", line, MIN(7, nread)))
+ ret = strtol(line, NULL, 16);
+
+ free(line);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* Ensure non-fatal signals prior to receive are unmodified */
+TEST(user_notification_wait_killable_pre_notification)
+{
+ struct sigaction new_action = {
+ .sa_handler = signal_handler,
+ };
+ int listener, status, sk_pair[2];
+ pid_t pid;
+ long ret;
+ char c;
+ /* 100 ms */
+ struct timespec delay = { .tv_nsec = 100000000 };
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(sigemptyset(&new_action.sa_mask), 0);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, ret)
+ {
+ TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
+ }
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(socketpair(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0, sk_pair), 0);
+
+ listener = user_notif_syscall(
+ __NR_getppid, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER |
+ SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV);
+ ASSERT_GE(listener, 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Check that we can kill the process with SIGUSR1 prior to receiving
+ * the notification. SIGUSR1 is wired up to a custom signal handler,
+ * and make sure it gets called.
+ */
+ pid = fork();
+ ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
+
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ close(sk_pair[0]);
+ handled = sk_pair[1];
+
+ /* Setup the non-fatal sigaction without SA_RESTART */
+ if (sigaction(SIGUSR1, &new_action, NULL)) {
+ perror("sigaction");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ ret = syscall(__NR_getppid);
+ /* Make sure we got a return from a signal interruption */
+ exit(ret != -1 || errno != EINTR);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure we've gotten to the seccomp user notification wait
+ * from getppid prior to sending any signals
+ */
+ while (get_proc_syscall(_metadata, pid) != __NR_getppid &&
+ get_proc_stat(_metadata, pid) != 'S')
+ nanosleep(&delay, NULL);
+
+ /* Send non-fatal kill signal */
+ EXPECT_EQ(kill(pid, SIGUSR1), 0);
+
+ /* wait for process to exit (exit checks for EINTR) */
+ EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid);
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, WIFEXITED(status));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(read(sk_pair[0], &c, 1), 1);
+}
+
+/* Ensure non-fatal signals after receive are blocked */
+TEST(user_notification_wait_killable)
+{
+ struct sigaction new_action = {
+ .sa_handler = signal_handler,
+ };
+ struct seccomp_notif_resp resp = {};
+ struct seccomp_notif req = {};
+ int listener, status, sk_pair[2];
+ pid_t pid;
+ long ret;
+ char c;
+ /* 100 ms */
+ struct timespec delay = { .tv_nsec = 100000000 };
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(sigemptyset(&new_action.sa_mask), 0);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, ret)
+ {
+ TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
+ }
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(socketpair(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0, sk_pair), 0);
+
+ listener = user_notif_syscall(
+ __NR_getppid, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER |
+ SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV);
+ ASSERT_GE(listener, 0);
+
+ pid = fork();
+ ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
+
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ close(sk_pair[0]);
+ handled = sk_pair[1];
+
+ /* Setup the sigaction without SA_RESTART */
+ if (sigaction(SIGUSR1, &new_action, NULL)) {
+ perror("sigaction");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ /* Make sure that the syscall is completed (no EINTR) */
+ ret = syscall(__NR_getppid);
+ exit(ret != USER_NOTIF_MAGIC);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Get the notification, to make move the notifying process into a
+ * non-preemptible (TASK_KILLABLE) state.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV, &req), 0);
+ /* Send non-fatal kill signal */
+ EXPECT_EQ(kill(pid, SIGUSR1), 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure the task enters moves to TASK_KILLABLE by waiting for
+ * D (Disk Sleep) state after receiving non-fatal signal.
+ */
+ while (get_proc_stat(_metadata, pid) != 'D')
+ nanosleep(&delay, NULL);
+
+ resp.id = req.id;
+ resp.val = USER_NOTIF_MAGIC;
+ /* Make sure the notification is found and able to be replied to */
+ EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND, &resp), 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure that the signal handler does get called once we're back in
+ * userspace.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(read(sk_pair[0], &c, 1), 1);
+ /* wait for process to exit (exit checks for USER_NOTIF_MAGIC) */
+ EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid);
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, WIFEXITED(status));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status));
+}
+
+/* Ensure fatal signals after receive are not blocked */
+TEST(user_notification_wait_killable_fatal)
+{
+ struct seccomp_notif req = {};
+ int listener, status;
+ pid_t pid;
+ long ret;
+ /* 100 ms */
+ struct timespec delay = { .tv_nsec = 100000000 };
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, ret)
+ {
+ TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
+ }
+
+ listener = user_notif_syscall(
+ __NR_getppid, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER |
+ SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV);
+ ASSERT_GE(listener, 0);
+
+ pid = fork();
+ ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
+
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ /* This should never complete as it should get a SIGTERM */
+ syscall(__NR_getppid);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ while (get_proc_stat(_metadata, pid) != 'S')
+ nanosleep(&delay, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Get the notification, to make move the notifying process into a
+ * non-preemptible (TASK_KILLABLE) state.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV, &req), 0);
+ /* Kill the process with a fatal signal */
+ EXPECT_EQ(kill(pid, SIGTERM), 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for the process to exit, and make sure the process terminated
+ * due to the SIGTERM signal.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid);
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, WIFSIGNALED(status));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SIGTERM, WTERMSIG(status));
+}
+
/*
* TODO:
* - expand NNP testing
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists