linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] drm/hyperv: Add error message for fb size greater than allocated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220503150806.neeemkwlexmyqsnd@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date:   Tue, 3 May 2022 15:08:06 +0000
From:   Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To:     Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
        "drawat.floss@...il.com" <drawat.floss@...il.com>,
        "airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/hyperv: Add error message for fb size greater
 than allocated

On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 07:50:16AM -0700, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 05:06:07AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > > From: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 9:29 PM
> > >  ...
> > > Add error message when the size of requested framebuffer is more than
> > > the allocated size by vmbus mmio region for framebuffer
> > 
> > The line lacks a period, but I guess the maintainer may help fix it for you :-)
> >  
> > > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> 
> Can this be queued for next ? please let me know in case any clarification required.

Applied to hyperv-next. Thanks.