[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxiBsQXbxQJf7Az3T+gq7Oph4joykqMB0EP87U=bj4LvSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 18:14:31 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] getting misc stats/attributes via xattr API
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 6:04 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 16:53, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 05:39:46PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>
> > > It should be noted that while this API mandates text keys,
> > > it does not mandate text values, so for example, sb iostats could be
> > > exported as text or as binary struct, or as individual text/binary records or
> > > all of the above.
> >
> > Ugh, no, that would be a total mess. Don't go exporting random binary
> > structs depending on the file, that's going to be completely
> > unmaintainable. As it is, this is going to be hard enough with random
> > text fields.
> >
> > As for this format, it needs to be required to be documented in
> > Documentation/ABI/ for each entry and key type so that we have a chance
> > of knowing what is going on and tracking how things are working and
> > validating stuff.
>
> My preference would be a single text value for each key.
>
> Contents of ":mnt:info" contradicts that, but mountinfo has a long
> established, well documented format, and nothing prevents exporting
> individual attributes with separate names as well (the getvalues(2)
> patch did exactly that).
>
Right, the fun is that ":mnt:info" and ":mnt:info:" can co-exist.
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists