linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/12] 4.19.241-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 May 2022 09:41:48 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/12] 4.19.241-rc1 review

On 5/3/22 07:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 07:16:52AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.241 release.
>>> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun, 01 May 2022 10:40:41 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> No cc this time ?
> 
> You and Pavel said this, yet I see your response here:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429234822.GB2444503@roeck-us.net
> that you sent on Friday.
> 
> Did some old email get unstuck and resent somehow?
> 
> 4.19.241 was released on Sunday, I have not sent out new -rc
> announcements yet.
> 
> confused,
> 

No, it is me who is confused. I saw Pavel's e-mail, checked stable,
found this announcement, and thought it was a new one since lore
reordered it after Pavel's reply.

The problem I reported is for v4.19.241-49-g667276a8c00e,
but is also affects v4.14.y.queue and v4.9.y.queue.

Sorry for the noise.

Guenter