[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnKs2E2t+coe2h3w@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 17:42:00 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alex.popov@...ux.com, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] arm64: entry: use
stackleak_erase_on_task_stack()
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:31:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On arm64 we always call stackleak_erase() on a task stack, and never
> call it on another stack. We can avoid some redundant work by using
> stackleak_erase_on_task_stack(), telling the stackleak code that it's
> being called on a task stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists