lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rri2i6o.fsf@cjr.nz>
Date:   Tue, 03 May 2022 22:35:43 -0300
From:   Paulo Alcantara <pc@....nz>
To:     Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@...ds.org>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>
Cc:     linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CIFS regression mounting vers=1.0 NTLMSSP when hostname is too
 long

Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@...ds.org> writes:

> I would like to report a regression in the CIFS fs. Sometime between Linux 4.14
> and 5.16, mounting CIFS with option vers=1.0 (and
> CONFIG_CIFS_ALLOW_INSECURE_LEGACY=y set appropriately) with security type
> NTLMSSP stopped working for me. The server side is a Windows 2003 Server.
>
> I found that this behavior depends on the length of the Linux client's
> host+domain name (e.g. utsname()->nodename), where the mount works as long as
> the name is 16 characters or less. Anything 17 or above returns -EIO, per the
> following example:

Looks like your server is expecting the WorkstationName field in
AUTHENTICATE_MESSAGE payload to be 16 bytes long.  That is, NetBIOS name
length as per rfc1001.

> I implemented a workaround using the following patch:
>
> Signed-off-by: Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@...ds.org>
> ---
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
>   #define XATTR_DOS_ATTRIB "user.DOSATTRIB"
>   #endif
>
> -#define CIFS_MAX_WORKSTATION_LEN  (__NEW_UTS_LEN + 1)  /* reasonable max for client */
> +#define CIFS_MAX_WORKSTATION_LEN 16
>
>   /*
>    * CIFS vfs client Status information (based on what we know.)
>
> I don't know if this patch is correct or will have any real effect outside of
> the NTLMSSP session connect sequence, but it worked in my case.

Perhaps we should be use TCP_Server_Info::workstation_RFC1001_name in
fs/cifs/sess.c:build_ntlmssp_auth_blob() instead only when connecting to
old servers by using insecure dialects -- like SMB1, in your case.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ