[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5249756-2fb8-e0f8-69f9-9ebb12a54618@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 14:33:11 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Major cpu partition code
restructuring
On 5/4/22 07:28, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 12:21:41PM -0400, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>> v10:
>> - Relax constraints for changes made to "cpuset.cpus"
>> and "cpuset.cpus.partition" as suggested. Now almost all changes
>> are allowed.
> I see there were also some other changes from v9 (like the first patches
> of series).
> Any chance you have a public git repo with both versions for a
> convenient range-diff?
That is true. Both patches 1 and 2 are new and the changes are pretty
straight forward. Patch 1 of v9 has been merged with a latent bug. Patch
4 of this series is a replacement of patch 3 "cgroup/cpuset: Refining
features and constraints of a partition" of v9. The other patches are
similar to their versions in v9 with some adjustment based on the
different code base.
I don't have a public repo. Attached is the file diff between v9 and v10
in cpuset.c with some other unrelated cpuset patches included.
Cheers,
Longman
View attachment "cpuset.c.v9.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (36505 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists