[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220504210840.GA469916@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 16:08:40 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:ALPHA PORT" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:IA64 (Itanium) PLATFORM" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:M68K ARCHITECTURE" <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:PARISC ARCHITECTURE" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:RISC-V ARCHITECTURE" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:SUPERH" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SPARC + UltraSPARC (sparc/sparc64)"
<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 01/39] Kconfig: introduce HAS_IOPORT option and select
it as necessary
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:49:59PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> We introduce a new HAS_IOPORT Kconfig option to indicate support for
> I/O Port access. In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will disable compilation
> of the I/O accessor functions inb()/outb() and friends on architectures
> which can not meaningfully support legacy I/O spaces such as s390 or
> where such support is optional.
So you plan to drop inb()/outb() on architectures where I/O port space
is optional? So even platforms that have I/O port space may not be
able to use it?
This feels like a lot of work where the main benefit is to keep
Kconfig from offering drivers that aren't of interest on s390.
Granted, there may be issues where inb()/outb() does the wrong thing
such as dereferencing null pointers when I/O port space isn't
implemented. I think that's a defect in inb()/outb() and could be
fixed there.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists