[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZnCjvjUSP=0M9dOxV6d5PGAP+yqa2P7F2T-Ksgkbmp5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 23:18:47 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...s.st.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the gpio-intel tree
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 5:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the fix. I think the best course of action is that Linus W.
> can pull the same branch that GPIO tree has into the pin control tree
> and resolve that, because the drivers touched are all pin control
> drivers while the core part of GPIO subsystem was updated.
Yup did this!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists