linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add lpasscore & lpassaudio clock controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 11:05:29 +0530
From:   Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add lpasscore & lpassaudio
 clock controllers

Hello Stephen,

On 5/4/2022 12:40 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2022-05-03 04:32:46)
>> Add the low pass audio clock controller device nodes. Keep the lpasscc
>> clock node disabled and enabled for lpass pil based devices.
> 
> Does it mean that we're going to have overlapping reg ranges between
> nodes in DT for clk controllers? That is not proper DT style, indicating
> that we should combine the overlapping nodes and then have some
> compatible or DT property telling us how to treat the clks in the audio
> subsystem.
> 

In the case where PIL based LPASS node would be used, we would disable 
the other lpass clock controller nodes. Does that seem fine or I would 
need to map the complete range in the current PIL driver if that works.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> [v4]
>>   * Mark lpasscc[lpasscc@...0000] device node as "disabled".

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.