[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e74aacdf-3ff7-261d-997f-5b6566b66207@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 11:05:29 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add lpasscore & lpassaudio
clock controllers
Hello Stephen,
On 5/4/2022 12:40 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2022-05-03 04:32:46)
>> Add the low pass audio clock controller device nodes. Keep the lpasscc
>> clock node disabled and enabled for lpass pil based devices.
>
> Does it mean that we're going to have overlapping reg ranges between
> nodes in DT for clk controllers? That is not proper DT style, indicating
> that we should combine the overlapping nodes and then have some
> compatible or DT property telling us how to treat the clks in the audio
> subsystem.
>
In the case where PIL based LPASS node would be used, we would disable
the other lpass clock controller nodes. Does that seem fine or I would
need to map the complete range in the current PIL driver if that works.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> [v4]
>> * Mark lpasscc[lpasscc@...0000] device node as "disabled".
--
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists