linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/48] ARM: pxa: hx4700: use gpio descriptors for audio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZNryYkidvdKuT57RM3fz6_X+3oOzF5xaOZd+TyScfUsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 23:59:30 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
        Paul Parsons <lost.distance@...oo.com>,
        Tomas Cech <sleep_walker@...e.com>,
        Sergey Lapin <slapin@...fans.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        IDE-ML <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/48] ARM: pxa: hx4700: use gpio descriptors for audio

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 9:08 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 11:41 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > (...)
> > > +static struct gpiod_lookup_table hx4700_audio_gpio_table = {
> > > +       .dev_id = "hx4700-audio",
> > > +       .table = {
> > > +               GPIO_LOOKUP("gpio-pxa", GPIO75_HX4700_EARPHONE_nDET,
> > > +                           "earphone-ndet", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
> >
> > This looks wrong. The n in nDET in the end of the name of the GPIO line
> > means active low does it not?
> >
> > What I usually do when I see this is to properly set it to
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW in the descriptor table, then invert the logic
> > where it's getting used.
> >
> > Also rename to earphone-det instead of -ndet
>
> Thanks for taking a look! I changed it now, but I don't know if
> I got the correct number of inversions in the end. How does this look?

Looks wrong, you can just invert the argument to any statement of set_value()
after tagging respective line as active low. Then gpilob will do a second
inversion.

> +               GPIO_LOOKUP("gpio-pxa", GPIO75_HX4700_EARPHONE_nDET,
> +                           "earphone-det", GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW),
> +               GPIO_LOOKUP("gpio-pxa", GPIO107_HX4700_SPK_nSD,
> +                           "spk-sd", GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW),

So those two have switched polarity.

> @@ -81,14 +79,14 @@ static const struct snd_soc_ops hx4700_ops = {
>  static int hx4700_spk_power(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
>                             struct snd_kcontrol *k, int event)
>  {
> -       gpio_set_value(GPIO107_HX4700_SPK_nSD, !!SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event));
> +       gpiod_set_value(gpiod_spk_sd, !!SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event));

Thus drop one ! in front of the expression, just !SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event)

> -       gpio_set_value(GPIO92_HX4700_HP_DRIVER, !!SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event));
> +       gpiod_set_value(gpiod_hp_driver, !!SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event));

But not this.

> +       gpiod_spk_sd = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "spk-sd", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);

These initial values don't seem to be set in the old code you could
just use GPIOD_ASIS as flag to make sure the new code behaves
the same.

Yours,
Linus Walleij