linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] random: mix hwgenerator randomness before sleeping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 07:36:53 +0200
From:   Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: mix hwgenerator randomness before sleeping

Hi Jason,

Am Wed, May 04, 2022 at 02:45:46AM +0200 schrieb Jason A. Donenfeld:
> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 9:56 PM Dominik Brodowski
> <linux@...inikbrodowski.net> wrote:
> >
> > Am Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:51:41PM +0200 schrieb Jason A. Donenfeld:
> > > The add_hwgenerator_randomness() function is called in a loop from a
> > > kthread by the hwgenerator core. It's supposed to sleep when there's
> > > nothing to do, and wake up periodically for more entropy. Right now it
> > > receives entropy, sleeps, and then mixes it in. This commit reverses the
> > > order, so that it always mixes in entropy sooner and sleeps after. This
> > > way the entropy is more fresh.
> >
> > ... however, the hwgenerator may take quite some time to accumulate entropy
> > after wakeup. So now we might have a delay between a wakeup ("we need more
> > entropy!") and that entropy becoming available. Beforehand, the thread only
> > went to sleep when there is no current need for "fresh" entropy.
> 
> Huh, interesting consideration. I didn't think about that. You wrote,
> "hwgenerator may take quite some time to accumulate entropy" -- any
> idea how long in the worst case? A second? A minute?

For TPM or virtio-rng, this shouldn't take long. But, for example, the
Kconfig entry for HW_RANDOM_TIMERIOMEM states that

	  This driver provides kernel-side support for a generic Random
	  Number Generator used by reading a 'dumb' iomem address that
	  is to be read no faster than, for example, once a second;
	  the default FPGA bitstream on the TS-7800 has such functionality.

Then, optee-rng.c contains a value "data_rate" in random bytes per second,
and may sleep for a considerable time:

	msleep((1000 * (max - read)) / pvt_data->data_rate);

Thanks,
	Dominik