linux-kernel - [PATCH] gpio: max77620: Make the irqchip immutable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220504111936.8412-1-jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 12:19:36 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: max77620: Make the irqchip immutable

Commit 6c846d026d49 ("gpio: Don't fiddle with irqchips marked as
immutable") added a warning to indicate if the gpiolib is altering the
internals of irqchips. Following this change the following warning is
now observed for the max77620 gpio driver ...

 WARNING KERN gpio gpiochip0: (max77620-gpio): not an immutable chip,
 	please consider fixing it!

Fix the above warning by making the max77620 gpio driver immutable.

Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
---
This warning is observed with v5.18-rc5 and so it would be great if
we can fix for v5.18. This is triggering a kernel warning test failure
on one of our platforms.

 drivers/gpio/gpio-max77620.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max77620.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max77620.c
index ebf9dea6546b..aa92658780d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max77620.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max77620.c
@@ -119,14 +119,23 @@ static void max77620_gpio_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
 	mutex_unlock(&gpio->buslock);
 }
 
-static struct irq_chip max77620_gpio_irqchip = {
+static void max77620_gpio_irq_print_chip(struct irq_data *data, struct seq_file *p)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	seq_printf(p, dev_name(gc->parent));
+}
+
+static const struct irq_chip max77620_gpio_irqchip = {
 	.name		= "max77620-gpio",
 	.irq_mask	= max77620_gpio_irq_mask,
 	.irq_unmask	= max77620_gpio_irq_unmask,
 	.irq_set_type	= max77620_gpio_set_irq_type,
 	.irq_bus_lock	= max77620_gpio_bus_lock,
 	.irq_bus_sync_unlock = max77620_gpio_bus_sync_unlock,
-	.flags		= IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND,
+	.irq_print_chip	= max77620_gpio_irq_print_chip,
+	.flags		= IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND,
+	GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
 };
 
 static int max77620_gpio_dir_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
@@ -318,7 +327,7 @@ static int max77620_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	mgpio->gpio_chip.base = -1;
 
 	girq = &mgpio->gpio_chip.irq;
-	girq->chip = &max77620_gpio_irqchip;
+	gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &max77620_gpio_irqchip);
 	/* This will let us handle the parent IRQ in the driver */
 	girq->parent_handler = NULL;
 	girq->num_parents = 0;
-- 
2.25.1