[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2205040752210.20320@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 07:54:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>, Jason@...c4.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hex2bin: make the function hex_to_bin constant-time
On Wed, 4 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 04:57:35AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 May 2022, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:07:48AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Just a heads up it seems this patch is causing some instability with crypto self
> > > tests on OpenRISC when using a PREEMPT kernel (no SMP).
> > >
> > > This was reported by Jason A. Donenfeld as it came up in wireguard testing.
> > >
> > > I am trying to figure out if this is an OpenRISC PREEMPT issue or something
> > > else.
>
> > That patch is so simple that I can't imagine how could it break the
> > curve25519 test. Are you sure that you bisected it correctly?
>
> Can you provide a test cases for hex_to_bin()?
I tested it with this:
#include <stdio.h>
int hex_to_bin(unsigned char c);
int main(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++)
printf("%02x - %d\n", i, hex_to_bin(i));
return 0;
}
Mikulas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists