linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: mediatek: devapc: Separate register offsets from mtk_devapc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220504115501.3490-3-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 19:55:00 +0800
From:   Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     <runyang.chen@...iatek.com>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
        Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: mediatek: devapc: Separate register offsets from mtk_devapc_data

The register offsets is the same between MT6779 and MT8186. To reuse the
register offsets, we move these register offsets to another structure
"mtk_devapc_regs_ofs".

Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
index 7c65ad3d1f8a..f27e22cbb770 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
@@ -31,10 +31,7 @@ struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs {
 	u32 vio_dbg1;
 };
 
-struct mtk_devapc_data {
-	/* numbers of violation index */
-	u32 vio_idx_num;
-
+struct mtk_devapc_regs_ofs {
 	/* reg offset */
 	u32 vio_mask_offset;
 	u32 vio_sta_offset;
@@ -46,6 +43,12 @@ struct mtk_devapc_data {
 	u32 vio_shift_con_offset;
 };
 
+struct mtk_devapc_data {
+	/* numbers of violation index */
+	u32 vio_idx_num;
+	const struct mtk_devapc_regs_ofs *regs_ofs;
+};
+
 struct mtk_devapc_context {
 	struct device *dev;
 	void __iomem *infra_base;
@@ -58,7 +61,7 @@ static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 	void __iomem *reg;
 	int i;
 
-	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_sta_offset;
+	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->regs_ofs->vio_sta_offset;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
 		writel(GENMASK(31, 0), reg + 4 * i);
@@ -73,7 +76,7 @@ static void mask_module_irq(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, bool mask)
 	u32 val;
 	int i;
 
-	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_mask_offset;
+	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->regs_ofs->vio_mask_offset;
 
 	if (mask)
 		val = GENMASK(31, 0);
@@ -116,11 +119,11 @@ static int devapc_sync_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 	u32 val;
 
 	pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = ctx->infra_base +
-			       ctx->data->vio_shift_sta_offset;
+			       ctx->data->regs_ofs->vio_shift_sta_offset;
 	pd_vio_shift_sel_reg = ctx->infra_base +
-			       ctx->data->vio_shift_sel_offset;
+			       ctx->data->regs_ofs->vio_shift_sel_offset;
 	pd_vio_shift_con_reg = ctx->infra_base +
-			       ctx->data->vio_shift_con_offset;
+			       ctx->data->regs_ofs->vio_shift_con_offset;
 
 	/* Find the minimum shift group which has violation */
 	val = readl(pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
@@ -161,8 +164,8 @@ static void devapc_extract_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 	void __iomem *vio_dbg0_reg;
 	void __iomem *vio_dbg1_reg;
 
-	vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_dbg0_offset;
-	vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_dbg1_offset;
+	vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->regs_ofs->vio_dbg0_offset;
+	vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->regs_ofs->vio_dbg1_offset;
 
 	vio_dbgs.vio_dbg0 = readl(vio_dbg0_reg);
 	vio_dbgs.vio_dbg1 = readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
@@ -200,7 +203,7 @@ static irqreturn_t devapc_violation_irq(int irq_number, void *data)
  */
 static void start_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 {
-	writel(BIT(31), ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
+	writel(BIT(31), ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->regs_ofs->apc_con_offset);
 
 	mask_module_irq(ctx, false);
 }
@@ -212,11 +215,10 @@ static void stop_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 {
 	mask_module_irq(ctx, true);
 
-	writel(BIT(2), ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->apc_con_offset);
+	writel(BIT(2), ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->regs_ofs->apc_con_offset);
 }
 
-static const struct mtk_devapc_data devapc_mt6779 = {
-	.vio_idx_num = 511,
+static const struct mtk_devapc_regs_ofs devapc_regs_ofs_mt6779 = {
 	.vio_mask_offset = 0x0,
 	.vio_sta_offset = 0x400,
 	.vio_dbg0_offset = 0x900,
@@ -227,6 +229,11 @@ static const struct mtk_devapc_data devapc_mt6779 = {
 	.vio_shift_con_offset = 0xF20,
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_devapc_data devapc_mt6779 = {
+	.vio_idx_num = 511,
+	.regs_ofs = &devapc_regs_ofs_mt6779,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_devapc_dt_match[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6779-devapc",
-- 
2.18.0