[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3100713.5fSG56mABF@diego>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 14:03:23 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: guoren@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, longman@...hat.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, jonas@...thpole.se,
stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi, shorne@...il.com,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, macro@...am.me.uk, jszhang@...nel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] RISC-V: Move to queued RW locks
Am Samstag, 30. April 2022, 17:36:25 CEST schrieb Palmer Dabbelt:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
>
> Now that we have fair spinlocks we can use the generic queued rwlocks,
> so we might as well do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
on riscv64+riscv32 qemu, beaglev and d1-nezha
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists