[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220504141619.pib3xwsqyqysto2h@houat>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 16:16:19 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/todo: Add entry for using kunit in the subsystem
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 10:34:39AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Maxime,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> On 5/4/22 10:10, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 10:02:12AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The Kernel Unit Testing (KUnit) framework provides a common framework for
> >> unit tests within the Linux kernel. Having a test suite would allow to
> >> identify regressions earlier.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> >> index 127e76ee0b2d..10bfb50908d1 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> >> @@ -603,6 +603,20 @@ Level: Advanced
> >> Better Testing
> >> ==============
> >>
> >> +Add unit tests using the Kernel Unit Testing (KUnit) framework
> >> +--------------------------------------------------------------
> >> +
> >> +The `KUnit <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/index.html>`_
> >> +provides a common framework for unit tests within the Linux kernel. Having a
> >> +test suite would allow to identify regressions earlier.
> >> +
> >> +A good candidate for the first unit tests are the format-conversion helpers in
> >> +``drm_format_helper.c``.
> >> +
> >> +Contact: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
> >> +
> >> +Level: Intermediate
> >
> > Kunit is fairly easy to grasp if you have some knowledge of other unit
> > testing frameworks already (pytest, cmocka, etc.)
> >
>
> Yes, I didn't set to intermediate due kunit but rather due the format
> conversions, since the functions are not easy to read and understand.
>
> And the person writing the unit tests will have to get familiar with
> the different formats to verify that conversions are done correctly.
>
> > Another good candidate would be to convert (some ?) selftests to kunit.
> > I'm not sure the others, but at least test-drm_cmdline_parser should be
> > fairly easy to convert.
> >
>
> Indeed. Maybe I would add it as a separate entr though, as a follow-up.
Yeah, that works for me
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists