[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 11:48:34 -0500
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, tj@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] ptrace: Don't change __state
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> writes:
> On 2022-05-04 17:40:56 [-0500], Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Stop playing with tsk->__state to remove TASK_WAKEKILL while a ptrace
>> command is executing.
>>
>> Instead remove TASK_WAKEKILL from the definition of TASK_TRACED, and
>> implemention a new jobctl flag TASK_PTRACE_FROZEN. This new flag is
> implement ?
Yes. Thank you.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists