lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu,  5 May 2022 11:14:36 -0700
From:   isaku.yamahata@...el.com
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 042/104] KVM: VMX: Introduce test mode related to EPT violation VE

From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>

To support TDX, KVM is enhanced to operate with #VE.  For TDX, KVM programs
to inject #VE conditionally and set #VE suppress bit in EPT entry.  For VMX
case, #VE isn't used.  If #VE happens for VMX, it's a bug.  To be
defensive (test that VMX case isn't broken), introduce option
ept_violation_ve_test and when it's set, set error.

Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 12 +++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c     | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h     |  3 ++
 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
index 9682f5a02da8..d3c8abcaa35e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
 #define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING		VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(ENCLS_EXITING)
 #define SECONDARY_EXEC_RDSEED_EXITING		VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(RDSEED_EXITING)
 #define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML               VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(PAGE_MOD_LOGGING)
+#define SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE		VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(EPT_VIOLATION_VE)
 #define SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_CONCEAL_VMX		VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(PT_CONCEAL_VMX)
 #define SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES			VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(XSAVES)
 #define SECONDARY_EXEC_MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC	VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC)
@@ -222,6 +223,8 @@ enum vmcs_field {
 	VMREAD_BITMAP_HIGH              = 0x00002027,
 	VMWRITE_BITMAP                  = 0x00002028,
 	VMWRITE_BITMAP_HIGH             = 0x00002029,
+	VE_INFORMATION_ADDRESS		= 0x0000202A,
+	VE_INFORMATION_ADDRESS_HIGH	= 0x0000202B,
 	XSS_EXIT_BITMAP                 = 0x0000202C,
 	XSS_EXIT_BITMAP_HIGH            = 0x0000202D,
 	ENCLS_EXITING_BITMAP		= 0x0000202E,
@@ -621,4 +624,13 @@ enum vmx_l1d_flush_state {
 
 extern enum vmx_l1d_flush_state l1tf_vmx_mitigation;
 
+struct vmx_ve_information {
+	u32 exit_reason;
+	u32 delivery;
+	u64 exit_qualification;
+	u64 guest_linear_address;
+	u64 guest_physical_address;
+	u16 eptp_index;
+};
+
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index d2314389f268..60dedae31426 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ module_param_named(pml, enable_pml, bool, S_IRUGO);
 static bool __read_mostly dump_invalid_vmcs = 0;
 module_param(dump_invalid_vmcs, bool, 0644);
 
+static bool __read_mostly ept_violation_ve_test = 0;
+module_param(ept_violation_ve_test, bool, 0444);
+
 #define MSR_BITMAP_MODE_X2APIC		1
 #define MSR_BITMAP_MODE_X2APIC_APICV	2
 
@@ -721,6 +724,13 @@ void vmx_update_exception_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	eb = (1u << PF_VECTOR) | (1u << UD_VECTOR) | (1u << MC_VECTOR) |
 	     (1u << DB_VECTOR) | (1u << AC_VECTOR);
+	/*
+	 * #VE isn't used for VMX, but for TDX.  To test against unexpected
+	 * change related to #VE for VMX, intercept unexpected #VE and warn on
+	 * it.
+	 */
+	if (ept_violation_ve_test)
+		eb |= 1u << VE_VECTOR;
 	/*
 	 * Guest access to VMware backdoor ports could legitimately
 	 * trigger #GP because of TSS I/O permission bitmap.
@@ -2490,6 +2500,8 @@ static int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
 			SECONDARY_EXEC_BUS_LOCK_DETECTION;
 		if (cpu_has_sgx())
 			opt2 |= SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING;
+		if (ept_violation_ve_test)
+			opt2 |= SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE;
 		if (adjust_vmx_controls(min2, opt2,
 					MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2,
 					&_cpu_based_2nd_exec_control) < 0)
@@ -2518,6 +2530,7 @@ static int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
 					     CPU_BASED_INVLPG_EXITING);
 	} else if (vmx_cap->ept) {
 		vmx_cap->ept = 0;
+		_cpu_based_2nd_exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE;
 		pr_warn_once("EPT CAP should not exist if not support "
 				"1-setting enable EPT VM-execution control\n");
 	}
@@ -4331,6 +4344,7 @@ static u32 vmx_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 		exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VPID;
 	if (!enable_ept) {
 		exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_EPT;
+		exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE;
 		enable_unrestricted_guest = 0;
 	}
 	if (!enable_unrestricted_guest)
@@ -4455,8 +4469,40 @@ static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 
 	exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx_exec_control(vmx));
 
-	if (cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls())
+	if (cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls()) {
 		secondary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx_secondary_exec_control(vmx));
+		if (secondary_exec_controls_get(vmx) &
+		    SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE) {
+			if (!vmx->ve_info) {
+				/* ve_info must be page aligned. */
+				struct page *page;
+
+				BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*vmx->ve_info) > PAGE_SIZE);
+				page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO);
+				if (page)
+					vmx->ve_info = page_to_virt(page);
+			}
+			if (vmx->ve_info) {
+				/*
+				 * Allow #VE delivery. CPU sets this field to
+				 * 0xFFFFFFFF on #VE delivery.  Another #VE can
+				 * occur only if software clears the field.
+				 */
+				vmx->ve_info->delivery = 0;
+				vmcs_write64(VE_INFORMATION_ADDRESS,
+					     __pa(vmx->ve_info));
+			} else {
+				/*
+				 * Because SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE is
+				 * used only when ept_violation_ve_test is true,
+				 * it's okay to go with the bit disabled.
+				 */
+				pr_err("Failed to allocate ve_info. disabling EPT_VIOLATION_VE.\n");
+				secondary_exec_controls_clearbit(
+					vmx, SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE);
+			}
+		}
+	}
 
 	if (cpu_has_tertiary_exec_ctrls())
 		tertiary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx_tertiary_exec_control(vmx));
@@ -5051,7 +5097,14 @@ static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (handle_guest_split_lock(kvm_rip_read(vcpu)))
 			return 1;
 		fallthrough;
+	case VE_VECTOR:
 	default:
+		if (ept_violation_ve_test && ex_no == VE_VECTOR) {
+			pr_err("VMEXIT due to unexpected #VE.\n");
+			secondary_exec_controls_clearbit(
+				vmx, SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE);
+			return 1;
+		}
 		kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_EXCEPTION;
 		kvm_run->ex.exception = ex_no;
 		kvm_run->ex.error_code = error_code;
@@ -6081,6 +6134,17 @@ void dump_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (secondary_exec_control & SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VPID)
 		pr_err("Virtual processor ID = 0x%04x\n",
 		       vmcs_read16(VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR_ID));
+	if (secondary_exec_control & SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VIOLATION_VE) {
+		struct vmx_ve_information *ve_info;
+		pr_err("VE info address = 0x%016llx\n",
+		       vmcs_read64(VE_INFORMATION_ADDRESS));
+		ve_info = __va(vmcs_read64(VE_INFORMATION_ADDRESS));
+		pr_err("ve_info: 0x%08x 0x%08x 0x%016llx 0x%016llx 0x%016llx 0x%04x\n",
+		       ve_info->exit_reason, ve_info->delivery,
+		       ve_info->exit_qualification,
+		       ve_info->guest_linear_address,
+		       ve_info->guest_physical_address, ve_info->eptp_index);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -7065,6 +7129,8 @@ void vmx_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	free_vpid(vmx->vpid);
 	nested_vmx_free_vcpu(vcpu);
 	free_loaded_vmcs(vmx->loaded_vmcs);
+	if (vmx->ve_info)
+		free_page((unsigned long)vmx->ve_info);
 }
 
 int vmx_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 36dbaf1add45..f49be71290bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -336,6 +336,9 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
 		DECLARE_BITMAP(read, MAX_POSSIBLE_PASSTHROUGH_MSRS);
 		DECLARE_BITMAP(write, MAX_POSSIBLE_PASSTHROUGH_MSRS);
 	} shadow_msr_intercept;
+
+	/* ve_info must be page aligned. */
+	struct vmx_ve_information *ve_info;
 };
 
 struct kvm_vmx {
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ