[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 11:20:44 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, macro@...am.me.uk, jszhang@...nel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Openrisc <openrisc@...ts.librecores.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] RISC-V: Move to queued RW locks
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:03 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> Am Samstag, 30. April 2022, 17:36:25 CEST schrieb Palmer Dabbelt:
> > From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
> >
> > Now that we have fair spinlocks we can use the generic queued rwlocks,
> > so we might as well do so.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
>
> on riscv64+riscv32 qemu, beaglev and d1-nezha
>
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists