[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 13:35:49 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86/fpu: Make FPU protection more robust
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:34 PM David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
>
> ...
> > + cycles_t end, start = get_cycles();
> > blake2s_update(&input_pool.hash, in, nbytes);
> > + end = get_cycles();
>
> If get_cycles() is rdtsc then that gives meaningless numbers.
> The cpu clock frequency will change on you.
>
> You can use one of the performance counters to get an actual
Indeed. In the process of wiring up rdpmc now.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists