linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.18-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 May 2022 14:46:22 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.18-rc6

On 5/5/22 14:39, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> please pull s390 updates for 5.18-rc6. Please note that this pull
> request includes two s390 specific kvm commits, which normally would
> have been routed via the kvm tree.
> 
> Due to lack of other patches in the kvm tree Christian Borntraeger
> asked to get them upstream via the s390 tree:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/249d0100-fa58-bf48-b1d2-f28e94c3a5f2@linux.ibm.com/

Needless to say, kvm patches have since materialized and I'll send a 
pull request later this week.

But anyway s390 is the architecture where I expect zero issues if KVM 
patches go in through arch maintainers.  Compared to other 
architectures, there are a lot more points of contact between KVM and 
the rest of arch/s390; you know the KVM code well; and honestly the 
whole architecture is mostly Amharic to me when it comes to the 
privileged interface.

Thanks,

Paolo