linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 May 2022 02:10:59 +0000
From:   qinjian[覃健] <qinjian@...lus1.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus
 SP7021 SoC boards

Thanks for your reply, I'll keep updating the original patch series.
Please ignore this patch.


Best regards,
----------------------------------------------
覃健 QinJian
SunMedia Technology(Chengdu)Co.,Ltd
凌阳成芯科技（成都）有限公司
Tel:86-28-87848688 EXT 5476
Fax:86-28-87848686
----------------------------------------------


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 6:34 AM
> To: qinjian[覃健] <qinjian@...lus1.com>
> Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards
> 
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
> > This introduces bindings for boards based Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
> >
> > This patch is separated from the patch series:
> > Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support. [1]
> > To simply thing, I extract it from the original and resend this patch.
> 
> This information doesn't belong in the commit msg. You should put
> context like this below the '---'.
> 
> Who suggested splitting this out? Normally, new SoC families series are
> applied as a whole by the SoC maintainers (Arnd/Olof).
> 
> Rob