linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 02/29] x86/apic: Add irq_cfg::delivery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <875ymih1yl.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Fri, 06 May 2022 21:53:54 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
        x86@...nel.org
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/29] x86/apic: Add irq_cfg::delivery_mode

On Thu, May 05 2022 at 16:59, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Currently, the delivery mode of all interrupts is set to the mode of the
> APIC driver in use. There are no restrictions in hardware to configure the
> delivery mode of each interrupt individually. Also, certain IRQs need
> to be

s/IRQ/interrupt/ Changelogs can do without acronyms.

> configured with a specific delivery mode (e.g., NMI).
>
> Add a new member, delivery_mode, to struct irq_cfg. Subsequent changesets
> will update every irq_domain to set the delivery mode of each IRQ to that
> specified in its irq_cfg data.
>
> To keep the current behavior, when allocating an IRQ in the root
> domain

The root domain does not allocate an interrupt. The root domain
allocates a vector for an interrupt. There is a very clear and technical
destinction. Can you please be more careful about the wording?

> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ static int x86_vector_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>  		irqd->chip_data = apicd;
>  		irqd->hwirq = virq + i;
>  		irqd_set_single_target(irqd);
> +

Stray newline.

>  		/*
>  		 * Prevent that any of these interrupts is invoked in
>  		 * non interrupt context via e.g. generic_handle_irq()
> @@ -577,6 +578,14 @@ static int x86_vector_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>  		/* Don't invoke affinity setter on deactivated interrupts */
>  		irqd_set_affinity_on_activate(irqd);
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * Initialize the delivery mode of this irq to match the

s/irq/interrupt/

> +		 * default delivery mode of the APIC. Children irq domains
> +		 * may take the delivery mode from the individual irq
> +		 * configuration rather than from the APIC driver.
> +		 */
> +		apicd->hw_irq_cfg.delivery_mode = apic->delivery_mode;
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * Legacy vectors are already assigned when the IOAPIC
>  		 * takes them over. They stay on the same vector. This is