[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWFMNPjrKJMC8EH4_D=bcT8JHWqrVaaM4v0c51dpypfJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 17:09:49 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 18/23] libperf evlist: Allow mixing per-thread and
per-cpu mmaps
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 9:58 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>
> mmap_per_evsel() will skip events that do not match the CPU, so all CPUs
> can be iterated in any case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/lib/perf/evlist.c | 36 +++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evlist.c b/tools/lib/perf/evlist.c
> index 048b546f9444..0acf43946479 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evlist.c
> @@ -508,29 +508,6 @@ mmap_per_evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist, struct perf_evlist_mmap_ops *ops,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int
> -mmap_per_thread(struct perf_evlist *evlist, struct perf_evlist_mmap_ops *ops,
> - struct perf_mmap_param *mp)
> -{
> - int thread;
> - int nr_threads = perf_thread_map__nr(evlist->threads);
> -
> - for (thread = 0; thread < nr_threads; thread++) {
> - int output = -1;
> - int output_overwrite = -1;
> -
> - if (mmap_per_evsel(evlist, ops, thread, mp, 0, thread,
> - &output, &output_overwrite))
> - goto out_unmap;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> -out_unmap:
> - perf_evlist__munmap(evlist);
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> static int
> mmap_per_cpu(struct perf_evlist *evlist, struct perf_evlist_mmap_ops *ops,
> struct perf_mmap_param *mp)
> @@ -561,9 +538,14 @@ static int perf_evlist__nr_mmaps(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
> {
> int nr_mmaps;
>
> + /* One for each CPU */
> nr_mmaps = perf_cpu_map__nr(evlist->all_cpus);
> - if (perf_cpu_map__empty(evlist->all_cpus))
> - nr_mmaps = perf_thread_map__nr(evlist->threads);
> + if (perf_cpu_map__empty(evlist->all_cpus)) {
Here with the current definition of perf_cpu_map__empty this is a NULL
or first element is any CPU (aka dummy) test. Given our conversation
this may not work as intended for that definition.
> + /* Plus one for each thread */
> + nr_mmaps += perf_thread_map__nr(evlist->threads);
> + /* Minus the per-thread CPU (-1) */
> + nr_mmaps -= 1;
> + }
>
> return nr_mmaps;
> }
> @@ -573,7 +555,6 @@ int perf_evlist__mmap_ops(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> struct perf_mmap_param *mp)
> {
> struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> - const struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = evlist->all_cpus;
>
> if (!ops || !ops->get || !ops->mmap)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -592,9 +573,6 @@ int perf_evlist__mmap_ops(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> if (evlist->pollfd.entries == NULL && perf_evlist__alloc_pollfd(evlist) < 0)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (perf_cpu_map__empty(cpus))
> - return mmap_per_thread(evlist, ops, mp);
> -
> return mmap_per_cpu(evlist, ops, mp);
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists