linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] On Semi AR0521 sensor driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3pmkryywn.fsf@t19.piap.pl>
Date:   Fri, 06 May 2022 08:10:16 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] On Semi AR0521 sensor driver

Hi Mauro et al,

Mauro, you are the drivers/media maintainer. Is the AR0521 driver ready
to be merged, are there still unresolved issues, or the driver is not no
be merged at all? I understand everyone's so busy but a simple yes or no
isn't too much, is it?

> Since it appears all remaining issues with the AR0521 driver have been
> resolved weeks ago... is there anything I should do in order to have the
> driver merged, should I rather proceed with the "staging" thing, or
> maybe some other option should be used?

-- 
Krzysztof "Chris" Hałasa

Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz
Przemysłowy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiarów PIAP
Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warszawa