[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnTGXGabf9UDoZyn@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 08:55:24 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, tj@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] ptrace: Document that wait_task_inactive can't
fail
On 2022-05-05 13:26:41 [-0500], Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> After ptrace_freeze_traced succeeds it is known that the the tracee
the
> has a __state value of __TASK_TRACED and that no __ptrace_unlink will
> happen because the tracer is waiting for the tracee, and the tracee is
> in ptrace_stop.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists