| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220506070102.26032-6-haoxu.linux@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 15:01:02 +0800
From: Hao Xu <haoxu.linux@...il.com>
To: io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept
From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@...cent.com>
Refactor io_accept() to support multishot mode.
theoretical analysis:
1) when connections come in fast
- singleshot:
add accept sqe(userpsace) --> accept inline
^ |
|-----------------|
- multishot:
add accept sqe(userspace) --> accept inline
^ |
|--*--|
we do accept repeatedly in * place until get EAGAIN
2) when connections come in at a low pressure
similar thing like 1), we reduce a lot of userspace-kernel context
switch and useless vfs_poll()
tests:
Did some tests, which goes in this way:
server client(multiple)
accept connect
read write
write read
close close
Basically, raise up a number of clients(on same machine with server) to
connect to the server, and then write some data to it, the server will
write those data back to the client after it receives them, and then
close the connection after write return. Then the client will read the
data and then close the connection. Here I test 10000 clients connect
one server, data size 128 bytes. And each client has a go routine for
it, so they come to the server in short time.
test 20 times before/after this patchset, time spent:(unit cycle, which
is the return value of clock())
before:
1930136+1940725+1907981+1947601+1923812+1928226+1911087+1905897+1941075
+1934374+1906614+1912504+1949110+1908790+1909951+1941672+1969525+1934984
+1934226+1914385)/20.0 = 1927633.75
after:
1858905+1917104+1895455+1963963+1892706+1889208+1874175+1904753+1874112
+1874985+1882706+1884642+1864694+1906508+1916150+1924250+1869060+1889506
+1871324+1940803)/20.0 = 1894750.45
(1927633.75 - 1894750.45) / 1927633.75 = 1.65%
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@...cent.com>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 0a83ecc457d1..9febe7774dc3 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1254,6 +1254,7 @@ static int io_close_fixed(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
static enum hrtimer_restart io_link_timeout_fn(struct hrtimer *timer);
static void io_eventfd_signal(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);
static void io_req_tw_post_queue(struct io_kiocb *req, s32 res, u32 cflags);
+static void io_poll_remove_entries(struct io_kiocb *req);
static struct kmem_cache *req_cachep;
@@ -5690,24 +5691,29 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
static int io_accept_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
{
struct io_accept *accept = &req->accept;
+ bool multishot;
if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
return -EINVAL;
- if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->len || sqe->buf_index)
+ if (sqe->len || sqe->buf_index)
return -EINVAL;
accept->addr = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
accept->addr_len = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr2));
accept->flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->accept_flags);
accept->nofile = rlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE);
+ multishot = !!(READ_ONCE(sqe->ioprio) & IORING_ACCEPT_MULTISHOT);
accept->file_slot = READ_ONCE(sqe->file_index);
- if (accept->file_slot && (accept->flags & SOCK_CLOEXEC))
+ if (accept->file_slot && ((accept->flags & SOCK_CLOEXEC) || multishot))
return -EINVAL;
if (accept->flags & ~(SOCK_CLOEXEC | SOCK_NONBLOCK))
return -EINVAL;
if (SOCK_NONBLOCK != O_NONBLOCK && (accept->flags & SOCK_NONBLOCK))
accept->flags = (accept->flags & ~SOCK_NONBLOCK) | O_NONBLOCK;
+ if (multishot)
+ req->flags |= REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -5730,6 +5736,7 @@ static inline void io_poll_clean(struct io_kiocb *req)
static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_accept *accept = &req->accept;
bool force_nonblock = issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
unsigned int file_flags = force_nonblock ? O_NONBLOCK : 0;
@@ -5737,10 +5744,13 @@ static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
struct file *file;
int ret, fd;
+retry:
if (!fixed) {
fd = __get_unused_fd_flags(accept->flags, accept->nofile);
- if (unlikely(fd < 0))
+ if (unlikely(fd < 0)) {
+ io_poll_clean(req);
return fd;
+ }
}
file = do_accept(req->file, file_flags, accept->addr, accept->addr_len,
accept->flags);
@@ -5748,8 +5758,12 @@ static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (!fixed)
put_unused_fd(fd);
ret = PTR_ERR(file);
- if (ret == -EAGAIN && force_nonblock)
- return -EAGAIN;
+ if (ret == -EAGAIN && force_nonblock) {
+ if ((req->flags & REQ_F_APOLL_MULTI_POLLED) ==
+ REQ_F_APOLL_MULTI_POLLED)
+ ret = 0;
+ return ret;
+ }
if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
ret = -EINTR;
req_set_fail(req);
@@ -5760,7 +5774,35 @@ static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ret = io_install_fixed_file(req, file, issue_flags,
accept->file_slot - 1);
}
- __io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, 0);
+
+ if (req->flags & REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT) {
+ if (ret >= 0) {
+ bool filled;
+
+ spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+ filled = io_fill_cqe_aux(ctx, req->cqe.user_data, ret,
+ IORING_CQE_F_MORE);
+ io_commit_cqring(ctx);
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+ if (unlikely(!filled)) {
+ io_poll_clean(req);
+ return -ECANCELED;
+ }
+ io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
+ goto retry;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * the apoll multishot req should handle poll
+ * cancellation by itself since the upper layer
+ * who called io_queue_sqe() cannot get errors
+ * happened here.
+ */
+ io_poll_clean(req);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
+ __io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, 0);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.36.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists