linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Set SPI flash to 50 MHz for herobrine boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YnRwQglUz9R61ZG/@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 May 2022 17:48:02 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, swboyd@...omium.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Set SPI flash to 50 MHz for
 herobrine boards

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 04:14:30PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> sc7280-herobrine based boards are specced to be able to access their
> SPI flash at 50 MHz with the drive strength of the pins set at 8. The
> drive strength is already set to 8 in "sc7280-herobrine.dtsi", so
> let's bump up the clock. The matching firmware change for this is at:
> 
> https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63948
> 
> NOTE: the firmware change isn't _required_ to make the kernel work at
> 50 MHz, it merely shows that the boards are known to work fine at 50
> MHz.
> 
> ALSO NOTE: this doesn't update the "sc7280-chrome-common.dtsi" file
> which is used by both herobrine boards and IDP. At the moment the IDP
> boards aren't configuring a drive strength of 8 and it seems safer to
> just leave them at the slower speed if they're already working.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>