| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220506081105.29134-11-p.raghav@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 10:11:04 +0200
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
To: jaegeuk@...nel.org, hare@...e.de, dsterba@...e.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
snitzer@...nel.org
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
bvanassche@....org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
matias.bjorling@....com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
gost.dev@...sung.com, jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev,
jiangbo.365@...edance.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/11] null_blk: allow non power of 2 zoned devices
Convert the power of 2 based calculation with zone size to be generic in
null_zone_no with optimization for power of 2 based zone sizes.
The nr_zones calculation in null_init_zoned_dev has been replaced with a
division without special handling for power of 2 based zone sizes as
this function is called only during the initialization and will not
invoked in the hot path.
Performance Measurement:
Device:
zone size = 128M, blocksize=4k
FIO cmd:
fio --name=zbc --filename=/dev/nullb0 --direct=1 --zonemode=zbd --size=23G
--io_size=<iosize> --ioengine=io_uring --iodepth=<iod> --rw=<mode> --bs=4k
--loops=4
The following results are an average of 4 runs on AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with
32GB of RAM:
Sequential Write:
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| IOdepth | 8 | 16 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| Without patch | 578 | 2257 | 12.80 | 576 | 2248 | 25.78 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| With patch | 581 | 2268 | 12.74 | 576 | 2248 | 25.85 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
Sequential read:
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| IOdepth | 8 | 16 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| Without patch | 667 | 2605 | 11.79 | 675 | 2637 | 23.49 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| With patch | 667 | 2605 | 11.79 | 675 | 2638 | 23.48 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
Random read:
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| IOdepth | 8 | 16 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| Without patch | 522 | 2038 | 15.05 | 514 | 2006 | 30.87 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
| With patch | 522 | 2039 | 15.04 | 523 | 2042 | 30.33 |
x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
Minor variations are noticed in Sequential write with io depth 8 and
in random read with io depth 16. But overall no noticeable differences
were noticed
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Reviewed by: Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
---
drivers/block/null_blk/main.c | 5 ++---
drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
index 5cb4c92cd..ed9a58201 100644
--- a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
+++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
@@ -1929,9 +1929,8 @@ static int null_validate_conf(struct nullb_device *dev)
if (dev->queue_mode == NULL_Q_BIO)
dev->mbps = 0;
- if (dev->zoned &&
- (!dev->zone_size || !is_power_of_2(dev->zone_size))) {
- pr_err("zone_size must be power-of-two\n");
+ if (dev->zoned && !dev->zone_size) {
+ pr_err("zone_size must not be zero\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c
index dae54dd1a..00c34e65e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c
+++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/zoned.c
@@ -13,7 +13,10 @@ static inline sector_t mb_to_sects(unsigned long mb)
static inline unsigned int null_zone_no(struct nullb_device *dev, sector_t sect)
{
- return sect >> ilog2(dev->zone_size_sects);
+ if (is_power_of_2(dev->zone_size_sects))
+ return sect >> ilog2(dev->zone_size_sects);
+
+ return div64_u64(sect, dev->zone_size_sects);
}
static inline void null_lock_zone_res(struct nullb_device *dev)
@@ -62,10 +65,6 @@ int null_init_zoned_dev(struct nullb_device *dev, struct request_queue *q)
sector_t sector = 0;
unsigned int i;
- if (!is_power_of_2(dev->zone_size)) {
- pr_err("zone_size must be power-of-two\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
if (dev->zone_size > dev->size) {
pr_err("Zone size larger than device capacity\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -83,8 +82,9 @@ int null_init_zoned_dev(struct nullb_device *dev, struct request_queue *q)
zone_capacity_sects = mb_to_sects(dev->zone_capacity);
dev_capacity_sects = mb_to_sects(dev->size);
dev->zone_size_sects = mb_to_sects(dev->zone_size);
- dev->nr_zones = round_up(dev_capacity_sects, dev->zone_size_sects)
- >> ilog2(dev->zone_size_sects);
+ dev->nr_zones =
+ div64_u64(roundup(dev_capacity_sects, dev->zone_size_sects),
+ dev->zone_size_sects);
dev->zones = kvmalloc_array(dev->nr_zones, sizeof(struct nullb_zone),
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists