linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] Re: time.c:undefined reference to `mach_get_rtc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45842084-938c-1e86-8b40-e883c9ae40bb@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 May 2022 16:16:06 +0800
From:   "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: time.c:undefined reference to `mach_get_rtc_pll'



On 5/4/2022 5:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:14 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> head:   107c948d1d3e61d10aee9d0f7c3d81bbee9842af
>> commit: 8b22820efb35f93d98638563b0a8f4094e8ee399 m68k: m68328: remove duplicate code
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     m68k-linux-ld: arch/m68k/kernel/time.o: in function `rtc_ioctl':
>>>> time.c:(.text+0x82): undefined reference to `mach_get_rtc_pll'
>>     m68k-linux-ld: time.c:(.text+0xbc): undefined reference to `mach_set_rtc_pll'
>>     m68k-linux-ld: time.c:(.text+0xf4): undefined reference to `mach_set_rtc_pll'
>>
> 
> I think this is just another build failure that was hidden before my patch,
> not caused by my patch.
> 
>        Arnd

Hi Arnd,

Sorry for the inconvenience, we have added it to the ignore list.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen