[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnezgji0.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 10:20:23 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, hdegoede@...hat.com,
markgross@...nel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, corbet@....net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
jithu.joseph@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] stop_machine: Add stop_core_cpuslocked() for
per-core operations
On Thu, May 05 2022 at 18:40, Tony Luck wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Hardware core level testing features require near simultaneous execution
> of WRMSR instructions on all threads of a core to initiate a test.
>
> Provide a customized cut down version of stop_machine_cpuslocked() that
> just operates on the threads of a single core.
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists