lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 10:20:23 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, hdegoede@...hat.com, markgross@...nel.org Cc: mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, corbet@....net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, jithu.joseph@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] stop_machine: Add stop_core_cpuslocked() for per-core operations On Thu, May 05 2022 at 18:40, Tony Luck wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> > > Hardware core level testing features require near simultaneous execution > of WRMSR instructions on all threads of a core to initiate a test. > > Provide a customized cut down version of stop_machine_cpuslocked() that > just operates on the threads of a single core. > > Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists