[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWednJQmogBst5LVia8WehaR39o53_dxCJUmaYWpGN2FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 17:55:25 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 21/23] libperf evsel: Add comments for booleans
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 9:58 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Add comments for 'system_wide' and 'requires_cpu' booleans
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evsel.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evsel.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evsel.h
> index 77fbb8b97e5c..f613c3ae868e 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evsel.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,15 @@ struct perf_evsel {
>
> /* parse modifier helper */
> int nr_members;
> + /*
> + * system_wide is for events that need to be on every CPU, irrespective
> + * of user requested CPUs or threads.
Will the cpu map agree with this? If not, what is the case for
all_cpus computed in propagate maps? Could we add this to comment.
> + */
> bool system_wide;
> + /*
> + * Some events, for example uncore events, require a CPU.
> + * i.e. it cannot be -1
nit: perhaps "cannot be 'any CPU' (-1)."
Thanks,
Ian
> + */
> bool requires_cpu;
> int idx;
> };
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists