[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a07ef5c8-8b6c-f9da-ecff-f58316218f23@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 12:09:47 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH pdx86-platform-drivers-x86] platform/x86:
thinkpad_acpi: quirk_s2idle_bug can be static
Hi,
On 5/3/22 20:21, kernel test robot wrote:
> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:322:20: warning: symbol 'quirk_s2idle_bug' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Fixes: a50dfa903391 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add a s2idle resume quirk for a number of laptops")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Thanks, since the original patch was still in my review-hans
branch (and not yet in for-next) I've squashed this fix into
the original patch.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index f385450af8647..d5431d3d4246f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ struct quirk_entry quirk_btusb_bug = {
> .btusb_bug = true,
> };
>
> -struct quirk_entry quirk_s2idle_bug = {
> +static struct quirk_entry quirk_s2idle_bug = {
> .s2idle_bug_mmio = 0xfed80380,
> };
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists