[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c089741c-d5c8-2e9f-c249-a0deb9cdc627@csgroup.eu>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 11:41:47 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/22] powerpc/ftrace: Make __ftrace_make_{nop/call}()
common to PPC32 and PPC64
Le 18/04/2022 à 08:40, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Since c93d4f6ecf4b ("powerpc/ftrace: Add module_trampoline_target()
>> for PPC32"), __ftrace_make_nop() for PPC32 is very similar to the
>> one for PPC64.
>>
>> Same for __ftrace_make_call().
>>
>> Make them common.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 108 +++--------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> index 1b05d33f96c6..2c7e42e439bb 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> @@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ static unsigned long find_bl_target(unsigned long
>> ip, ppc_inst_t op)
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>> static int
>> __ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod,
>> struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
>> @@ -154,10 +153,11 @@ __ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL
>> - /* When using -mkernel_profile there is no load to jump over */
>> + /* When using -mkernel_profile or PPC32 there is no load to jump
>> over */
> -mprofile-kernel
>
> Since you are modifying that line anyway ^^
>
>
>> pop = ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_NOP());
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL
>> if (copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(&op, (void *)(ip - 4))) {
>> pr_err("Fetching instruction at %lx failed.\n", ip - 4);
>> return -EFAULT;
>> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ __ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL */
>> +#endif /* PPC64 */
>>
>> if (patch_instruction((u32 *)ip, pop)) {
>> pr_err("Patching NOP failed.\n");
>> @@ -209,48 +210,6 @@ __ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod,
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -
>> -#else /* !PPC64 */
>> -static int
>> -__ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod,
>> - struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
>> -{
>> - ppc_inst_t op;
>> - unsigned long ip = rec->ip;
>> - unsigned long tramp, ptr;
>> -
>> - if (copy_from_kernel_nofault(&op, (void *)ip, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE))
>> - return -EFAULT;
>> -
>> - /* Make sure that that this is still a 24bit jump */
>> - if (!is_bl_op(op)) {
>> - pr_err("Not expected bl: opcode is %s\n", ppc_inst_as_str(op));
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> - /* lets find where the pointer goes */
>> - tramp = find_bl_target(ip, op);
>> -
>> - /* Find where the trampoline jumps to */
>> - if (module_trampoline_target(mod, tramp, &ptr)) {
>> - pr_err("Failed to get trampoline target\n");
>> - return -EFAULT;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (ptr != addr) {
>> - pr_err("Trampoline location %08lx does not match addr\n",
>> - tramp);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> - op = ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_NOP());
>> -
>> - if (patch_instruction((u32 *)ip, op))
>> - return -EPERM;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -#endif /* PPC64 */
>> #endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
>>
>> static unsigned long find_ftrace_tramp(unsigned long ip)
>> @@ -437,13 +396,12 @@ int ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod,
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>> /*
>> * Examine the existing instructions for __ftrace_make_call.
>> * They should effectively be a NOP, and follow formal constraints,
>> * depending on the ABI. Return false if they don't.
>> */
>> -#ifndef CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
>
> It is better to gate this on PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1
Ok I do that with the new CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1.
>
>> static int
>> expected_nop_sequence(void *ip, ppc_inst_t op0, ppc_inst_t op1)
>> {
>> @@ -465,7 +423,7 @@ expected_nop_sequence(void *ip, ppc_inst_t op0,
>> ppc_inst_t op1)
>> static int
>> expected_nop_sequence(void *ip, ppc_inst_t op0, ppc_inst_t op1)
>> {
>> - /* look for patched "NOP" on ppc64 with -mprofile-kernel */
>> + /* look for patched "NOP" on ppc64 with -mprofile-kernel or ppc32 */
>> if (!ppc_inst_equal(op0, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_NOP())))
>> return 0;
>> return 1;
>> @@ -484,8 +442,10 @@ __ftrace_make_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec,
>> unsigned long addr)
>> if (copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(op, ip))
>> return -EFAULT;
>>
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
>> if (copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(op + 1, ip + 4))
>> return -EFAULT;
>> +#endif
>
> Here too...
>
Done
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists