[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220506015801.757918-3-liupeng256@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 01:58:01 +0000
From: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
To: <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
<guohanjun@...wei.com>, <sudeep.holla@....com>,
<rafael@...nel.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <logang@...tatee.com>,
<martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>, <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
<axboe@...nel.dk>, <kch@...dia.com>, <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
<shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>, <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
<jiangguoqing@...inos.cn>, <jpittman@...hat.com>,
<dave@...olabs.net>, <liupeng256@...wei.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] null_blk: fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes
Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes,
a valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes. So, the use of
"nid >= nr_online_nodes" to judge if a node is online is wrong.
Node id is a basic parameter of the system, a user-configured node
must be checked as early as possible. Otherwise, it may cause panic
when calling some vulnerable functions such as node_online which
will cause panic if a very big node is received.
Check g_home_node once users config it, and use node_available to
make node-checking compatible with sparse/discontiguous nodes.
Fixes: 7ff684a683d7 ("null_blk: prevent crash from bad home_node value")
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
---
drivers/block/null_blk/main.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
index 05b1120e6623..995348d6e7e7 100644
--- a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
+++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
@@ -97,7 +97,33 @@ module_param_named(poll_queues, g_poll_queues, int, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(poll_queues, "Number of IOPOLL submission queues");
static int g_home_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
-module_param_named(home_node, g_home_node, int, 0444);
+
+static int null_param_store_val(const char *str, int *val, int min, int max)
+{
+ int ret, new_val;
+
+ ret = kstrtoint(str, 10, &new_val);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (new_val < min || new_val > max)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ *val = new_val;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int null_set_home_node(const char *str, const struct kernel_param *kp)
+{
+ return null_param_store_val(str, &g_home_node, 0, MAX_NUMNODES - 1);
+}
+
+static const struct kernel_param_ops null_home_node_param_ops = {
+ .set = null_set_home_node,
+ .get = param_get_int,
+};
+
+device_param_cb(home_node, &null_home_node_param_ops, &g_home_node, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(home_node, "Home node for the device");
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NULL_BLK_FAULT_INJECTION
@@ -120,21 +146,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(init_hctx, "Fault injection to fail hctx init. init_hctx=<inter
static int g_queue_mode = NULL_Q_MQ;
-static int null_param_store_val(const char *str, int *val, int min, int max)
-{
- int ret, new_val;
-
- ret = kstrtoint(str, 10, &new_val);
- if (ret)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (new_val < min || new_val > max)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- *val = new_val;
- return 0;
-}
-
static int null_set_queue_mode(const char *str, const struct kernel_param *kp)
{
return null_param_store_val(str, &g_queue_mode, NULL_Q_BIO, NULL_Q_MQ);
@@ -2107,7 +2118,7 @@ static int __init null_init(void)
g_max_sectors = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
}
- if (g_home_node != NUMA_NO_NODE && g_home_node >= nr_online_nodes) {
+ if (!node_available(g_home_node)) {
pr_err("invalid home_node value\n");
g_home_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists