linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 20/24] LoongArch: Add efistub booting support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 May 2022 21:20:49 +0800
From:   Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
        Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 20/24] LoongArch: Add efistub booting support

Hi, Ard, Arnd and Xuerui,

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:41 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:26 PM WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name> wrote:
> > On 5/6/22 16:14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> > Or is there compatibility at all?
> >
> > It turns out that this port is already incompatible with shipped
> > systems, in other ways, at least since the March revision or so.
>
> I think we can treat user space compatibility separately from firmware
> compatibility.
>
> > So, in effect, this port is starting from scratch, and taking the chance
> > to fix early mistakes and oversights all over; hence my opinion is,
> > better do the Right Thing (tm) and give the generic codepath a chance.
> >
> > For the Loongson devs: at least, declare the struct boot_params flow
> > deprecated from day one, then work to eliminate it from future products,
> > if you really don't want to delay merging even further (it's already
> > unlikely to land in 5.19, given the discussion happening in LKML [3]).
> > It's not embarrassing to admit mistakes; we all make mistakes, and
> > what's important is to learn from them so we don't collectively repeat
> > ourselves.
>
> Agreed. I think there can be limited compatibility support for old
> firmware though, at least to help with the migration: As long as
> the interface between grub and linux has a proper definition following
> the normal UEFI standard, there can be both a modern grub
> that is booted using the same protocol and a backwards-compatible
> grub that can be booted from existing firmware and that is able
> to boot the kernel.
>
> The compatibility version of grub can be retired after the firmware
> itself is able to speak the normal boot protocol.
After an internal discussion, we decide to use the generic stub, and
we have a draft version of generic stub now[1]. I hope V10 can solve
all problems. :)
[1] https://github.com/loongson/linux/tree/loongarch-next-generic-stub

Huacai
>
>        Arnd