[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2205061426390.52331@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 14:40:09 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"open list:IA64 (Itanium) PLATFORM" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SUPERH" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"open list:SPARC + UltraSPARC (sparc/sparc64)"
<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:RISC-V ARCHITECTURE" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
"open list:M68K ARCHITECTURE" <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"open list:PARISC ARCHITECTURE" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"open list:ALPHA PORT" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 01/39] Kconfig: introduce HAS_IOPORT option and select
it as necessary
On Fri, 6 May 2022, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> A loooong time ago, it was suggested to add register accessor
> functions to struct device, so e.g. readl(dev, offset) would call
> into these accessors, which would implement the bus-specific behavior.
> No more worries about readl(), __raw_readl(), ioread32b(), or whatever
> quirk is needed, at the (small on nowadays' machines) expense of
> some indirection...
I guess you'd need an additional parameter for the endianness policy
required (to match either bit or byte lanes, according to ultimate data
interpretation) where crossing between buses of a different endianness
each. Otherwise you'd end up with the mess elsewhere.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists