linux-kernel - Re: CIFS regression mounting vers=1.0 NTLMSSP when hostname is too long

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wneyah9p.fsf@cjr.nz>
Date:   Fri, 06 May 2022 11:05:06 -0300
From:   Paulo Alcantara <pc@....nz>
To:     ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>
Cc:     Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, Steven French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@...ds.org>,
        Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@...il.com>,
        linux-cifs <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CIFS regression mounting vers=1.0 NTLMSSP when hostname is too
 long

ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@...il.com> writes:

> This regression should be easy to fix, but maybe we should not have
> done the initial change in the first place.
> If things is broken and do not work under SMB1, that is a good thing.
> Instead of adding features or fixing
> missing parts to SMB1 we should just tell people to switch to SMB2 instead.
>
> I think if things do not work correctly or things are missing in smb1,
> that is a GOOD THING.
> :-)

LOL - couldn't agree more :-)