[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b60eb1c5-4836-5f62-315e-211a0fe03362@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 08:32:16 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Hao Xu <haoxu.linux@...il.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: add IORING_ACCEPT_MULTISHOT for accept
On 5/6/22 1:00 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
> From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@...cent.com>
>
> add an accept_flag IORING_ACCEPT_MULTISHOT for accept, which is to
> support multishot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@...cent.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> index fad63564678a..73bc7e54ac18 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,11 @@ enum {
> #define IORING_ASYNC_CANCEL_FD (1U << 1)
> #define IORING_ASYNC_CANCEL_ANY (1U << 2)
>
> +/*
> + * accept flags stored in accept_flags
> + */
> +#define IORING_ACCEPT_MULTISHOT (1U << 15)
It isn't stored in accept_flags, is it? This is an io_uring private
flag, and it's in ioprio. Which is honestly a good place for per-op
private flags, since nobody really uses ioprio outside of read/write
style requests. But the comment is wrong :-)
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists